Google turned on Instant Previews for Ads last month. Now, a little magnifying glass appears next to each search ad, which the user can click on to see a preview of the landing page for the ad.
It may not have received much fanfare, but this is a huge change for post-click marketing.
Until now, PPC marketing and landing page optimization were separated by a gap: the click. The only information a user had to make a decision to click was (1) the text of the ad itself, a mere 135 characters and (2) the position of the ad as a faint signal of quality or value. And, where applicable, any brand equity that the advertiser had previously established. It wasn’t until the user clicked that they could factor in the actual experience that the advertiser would deliver in return.
That structure let a lot of advertisers get away with poor post-click marketing experiences. As long as the ad — just the ad — tempted people enough to click, they generated their traffic, increased their click-through rate (CTR), and had a shot at snaring some fraction of those respondents in a conversion.
But the game has changed. Poor post-click marketing experiences can no longer hide behind the click.
Now, upon entering this “preview mode,” a user can hover over any ad — or organic listing — on the search results page (SERP) to see what its landing page looks like. They can read snippets of text from the actual page to see how closely it relates to the text of the ad. And by effortlessly moving their mouse around the SERP, they can quickly compare all of the different advertisers before they decide to click on any.
Would you choose A or B? Personally, I think A is a better ad, but B is certainly credible. “Sit back and relax. Leave the driving to us.” That’s an appealing proposition, and in your mind’s eye, you can almost see a limo winding its way through mountain vineyards. You might click on both.
Now take a look at these ads with the preview mode enabled:
Changes your perspective immediately, doesn’t it? I reduced the size of these to fit here, but even without reading the details, you can tell at a glance that A is still credible and consistent with its ad.
But B suddenly looks like junk. Its snippets of text are just keyword spam. Its island-themed photo of people in Hawaiian shirts clashes with the mental image of a Napa Valley wine tour. The headline of “Wine Tours in Napa” and the custom URL of www.winecountrytours.com are not enough to save B. Its credibility is shot.
That’s a big change in the laws of the search universe.
First and foremost, design matters. A landing page that looks good can now send a signal of the quality of the advertiser — potentially a stronger signal than the text of the ad or its position on the SERP. Compelling landing page design can now differentiate you before the click, as well as after.
Second, message match matters. In other words, the promises that the ad makes should be reflected in the copy and imagery of the landing page. Here’s a great example by Silverpop, whose ad promises “The Top 5 Questions You Should Ask When Selecting Marketing Automation” — and their landing page preview clearly fulfills that promise.
Third, don’t put long forms on your landing page — unless your conversion offer is extremely persuasive. Users who preview a page with a long form and very little other content are likely to be reluctant to click through. (“Oh, goody, I can’t wait to fill out all those fields!”)
Instead, consider using a short form — such as just asking for name and email address. Or postpone your form to the second page of your landing experience. Or implement “progressive conversion,” just asking one or two fields on page one, and then following up with subsequent questions on page two or three. This becomes an additional benefit of deploying multi-step landing experiences.
For example, consider this landing page to a multi-step experience, with the form postponed to page two:
Fourth, speaking of testing, think carefully about your A/B and multivariate testing when experimenting with significantly different offers on your landing page. Google has not made clear exactly when and how they capture these preview thumbnails. If they happen to capture a thumbnail with a big “40% offer” banner, but then when the user clicks through they don’t see that in their version, that would not be good.
One way to prevent problems here is to test with matched pairs of ads and landing pages. So instead of testing one ad with two different A/B versions of a landing page, test an A version of the ad matched to an A version of the landing page against a B version of the ad matched to a B version of the landing page. (In this case, the A and B landing pages should have separate URLs.)
Which landing page previews have the greatest impact on CTR? What’s the relationship between that new CTR and the subsequent conversion rate (now that people have a clearer expectation of what the landing page will deliver)? These are all excellent opportunities for new conversion optimization experiments.
In addition to winning more traffic, this may indirectly impact your quality score. Although Google says these previews will not effect quality score directly, it’s generally accepted that CTR is a significant factor in quality score. So if great landing page previews increase your CTR, your quality score benefits indirectly.
Congratulations, Conversion Science readers. Google has effectively elevated your post-click mission to the very top of the search marketing funnel.
by Scott Brinker
Source -
It may not have received much fanfare, but this is a huge change for post-click marketing.
Until now, PPC marketing and landing page optimization were separated by a gap: the click. The only information a user had to make a decision to click was (1) the text of the ad itself, a mere 135 characters and (2) the position of the ad as a faint signal of quality or value. And, where applicable, any brand equity that the advertiser had previously established. It wasn’t until the user clicked that they could factor in the actual experience that the advertiser would deliver in return.
That structure let a lot of advertisers get away with poor post-click marketing experiences. As long as the ad — just the ad — tempted people enough to click, they generated their traffic, increased their click-through rate (CTR), and had a shot at snaring some fraction of those respondents in a conversion.
But the game has changed. Poor post-click marketing experiences can no longer hide behind the click.
Now, upon entering this “preview mode,” a user can hover over any ad — or organic listing — on the search results page (SERP) to see what its landing page looks like. They can read snippets of text from the actual page to see how closely it relates to the text of the ad. And by effortlessly moving their mouse around the SERP, they can quickly compare all of the different advertisers before they decide to click on any.
Pre-Click & Post-Click Marketing Converge
To appreciate the impact of this change, imagine that you’re thinking of touring of some wineries in Napa. You do a search for “Napa Valley wineries” and see the following two ads:Would you choose A or B? Personally, I think A is a better ad, but B is certainly credible. “Sit back and relax. Leave the driving to us.” That’s an appealing proposition, and in your mind’s eye, you can almost see a limo winding its way through mountain vineyards. You might click on both.
Now take a look at these ads with the preview mode enabled:
Changes your perspective immediately, doesn’t it? I reduced the size of these to fit here, but even without reading the details, you can tell at a glance that A is still credible and consistent with its ad.
But B suddenly looks like junk. Its snippets of text are just keyword spam. Its island-themed photo of people in Hawaiian shirts clashes with the mental image of a Napa Valley wine tour. The headline of “Wine Tours in Napa” and the custom URL of www.winecountrytours.com are not enough to save B. Its credibility is shot.
That’s a big change in the laws of the search universe.
Best Practices For Instant Preview Landing Pages
Google Instant Preview for Ads immediately suggests several best practices for landing pages.First and foremost, design matters. A landing page that looks good can now send a signal of the quality of the advertiser — potentially a stronger signal than the text of the ad or its position on the SERP. Compelling landing page design can now differentiate you before the click, as well as after.
Second, message match matters. In other words, the promises that the ad makes should be reflected in the copy and imagery of the landing page. Here’s a great example by Silverpop, whose ad promises “The Top 5 Questions You Should Ask When Selecting Marketing Automation” — and their landing page preview clearly fulfills that promise.
Third, don’t put long forms on your landing page — unless your conversion offer is extremely persuasive. Users who preview a page with a long form and very little other content are likely to be reluctant to click through. (“Oh, goody, I can’t wait to fill out all those fields!”)
Instead, consider using a short form — such as just asking for name and email address. Or postpone your form to the second page of your landing experience. Or implement “progressive conversion,” just asking one or two fields on page one, and then following up with subsequent questions on page two or three. This becomes an additional benefit of deploying multi-step landing experiences.
For example, consider this landing page to a multi-step experience, with the form postponed to page two:
Fourth, speaking of testing, think carefully about your A/B and multivariate testing when experimenting with significantly different offers on your landing page. Google has not made clear exactly when and how they capture these preview thumbnails. If they happen to capture a thumbnail with a big “40% offer” banner, but then when the user clicks through they don’t see that in their version, that would not be good.
One way to prevent problems here is to test with matched pairs of ads and landing pages. So instead of testing one ad with two different A/B versions of a landing page, test an A version of the ad matched to an A version of the landing page against a B version of the ad matched to a B version of the landing page. (In this case, the A and B landing pages should have separate URLs.)
Click-Through Metrics For Landing Pages
This move by Google now makes the click-through rate (CTR) metric relevant to landing pages. As people become aware of this feature, previews of good landing pages will garner more clicks than previews of bad landing pages. This is certainly easy enough to test with matched pairs of ads and landing pages, as we discussed above.Which landing page previews have the greatest impact on CTR? What’s the relationship between that new CTR and the subsequent conversion rate (now that people have a clearer expectation of what the landing page will deliver)? These are all excellent opportunities for new conversion optimization experiments.
In addition to winning more traffic, this may indirectly impact your quality score. Although Google says these previews will not effect quality score directly, it’s generally accepted that CTR is a significant factor in quality score. So if great landing page previews increase your CTR, your quality score benefits indirectly.
Congratulations, Conversion Science readers. Google has effectively elevated your post-click mission to the very top of the search marketing funnel.
by Scott Brinker
Source -
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.