Blog Disclaimer

The posts published in this blog are collected from different blogs or websites written by various famous bloggers/writers. I have just collected these posts only. These posts are not written by me. All collected posts are the great stuffs.

Blog Disclaimer

All content provided/collected on this blog is for informational purposes only, it is not used for any commercial purpose. At the end of any post, the visitor can find the link of the original source.

Blog Disclaimer

At the end of any post, the visitor can find the link of the original source. These posts are only for further reference to review/study latter. It’s a request to all visitors; please go through the original post by clicking on the source given below/above of every post.

July 3, 2011

Standard "Benchmarking" Report in Your Google Analytics Account

1. Introduction

Welcome to the first volume of the Analytics Benchmarking Newsletter!
This month, we are replacing the standard "benchmarking" report in your Google Analytics account with data shared in this newsletter. We are using this newsletter as an experiment to surface more useful or interesting data to Analytics users. Data contained here comes from all websites which have opted-in anonymous data sharing with Google Analytics. Only those website administrators which have enabled this anonymous data sharing will receive this "benchmarking" newsletter.
You may be wondering, how many websites are in this "anonymous data sharing" pool? Currently, hundreds of thousands, and we've endeavored to make all of the metrics here statistically significant.
The date range of comparison for this newsletter is from November 1, 2010 - February 1, 2011. Comparison is done with data from November 1, 2009 - February 1, 2010. Absolute metrics such as total # visits, pageviews, or conversions for all opted-in websites are not reported.
To simplify the prose, the phrase "websites" will represent "websites which have opted into anonymous data sharing with Google Analytics" for the rest of this newsletter.

2. Site Metrics

Compared to a year ago, websites have seen reduced pages / visit, average time on site, as well as bounce rate.

11/1/09 - 2/1/1011/1/10 - 2/1/11Difference
Pages/Visit4.94.5-0.4
Bounce Rate48.2%47.0%-1.2%
Avg Time on Site5:495:23-0:26

2.1 Breakdown by Geography

Our anonymous database has aggregated geographic breakdown at the country level. Here are a few representative countries and their respective aggregate metrics. The first number in each cell represents the metric for the date range 11/1/10-2/1/11. The parenthesized number is the Year over Year delta compared to a year ago.
CountryPages / VisitBounce RateAvg Time on Site
United States4.7 (-0.1)42.5% (-6.1%)6:06 (-0:10)
United Kingdom4.9 (-0.3)41.5% (+0.2%)5:38 (-0.27)
France4.4 (-0.4)49.7% (+1.4%)4:40 (-0:08)
Brazil4.1 (-0.1)47.8% (-2.9%)5:20 (+0:03)
China4.1 (-0.1)58.2% (+1.0%)3:46 (+0:37)
Japan3.9 (-0.1)48.6% (-9.0%)3:47 (-2:59)
For bounce rate, the distribution by country is plotted below:
The distribution above is annotated with some countries -- which seem to indicate a story of leisure and stage of economic development. For a related metric: average time on site, the distribution by country is plotted below:
The type of countries annotated in the average time on site graph above seem to be in reverse order as those in the bounce rate distribution.

2.2 Breakdown by Traffic Sources

Traffic sources below are identified by how the "source" and "medium""" parameters are received by the Google Analytics collecting servers. Here is an article describing what these designations refer to.
Traffic SourcesPages / VisitBounce RateAvg Time on Site
Direct4.0 (-0.5)47.2% (-4.0%)5:21 (-0:07)
Referral5.0 (+0.1)43.1% (-1.1%)6:36 (-1:48)
Organic Search4.9 (-0.1)47.9% (-1.1%)4:43 (+0:06)
CPC Search5.6 (+0.0)41.4 (-1.7%)3:57(+0:07)

2.4 Conversion Rate Distribution

Many marketers' favorite metric is conversion rate. Here is the worldwide distribution of Google Analytics "goal conversion rate" by country.
Would anyone have guessed that states which are known for conversions are also high for their citizens' goal conversion rate? Note that for some states with few population, the statistical significance of the conversion metric comes into doubt.

3. Traffic Sources

Traffic sources below are identified by how the "source" and "medium" parameters are received by the Google Analytics collecting servers. Here is an article describing what these designations refer to.
% Visits from Sources11/1/09 - 2/1/1011/1/10 - 2/1/11Difference
Direct36.5%36.8%+0.3%
Referral21.0%19.4%-1.6%
Search Engines27.0%28.0%+1.0%
Other15.5%15.8%+0.3%

4. Operating Systems

Browsers and Operation Systems (OS) are identified by the "referrer" string sent by users' browsers.
% Visits from OS11/1/09 - 2/1/1011/1/10 - 2/1/11Difference
Windows89.9%84.8%-5.1%
Macintosh4.5%5.2%+0.7%
Linux0.6%0.7%+0.1%
Other5%9.3%+4.3%

July 1, 2011

SEO for PDF File

Tutorial and Pictorial - Optimizing PDFs for Search

This quick Tutorial assumes that you have Adobe Acrobat and/or a similar authoring program for the editing of PDF Documents.
Note that you DO NOT need the publishing program originally used to create the documents e.g. InDesign. I'm using Adobe Acrobat for this Tutorial/Pictorial.
My example uses the Google Guidelines for Quality Raters PDF which is optimized for search.
Let's get started! From Adobe Acrobat go to the File menu and select Properties.

File Properties Table of Contents

  1. PDF Document Properties - Description
  2. PDF Document Properties - Additional Metadata
  3. PDF Document Properties - 5 Examples
  4. PDF Document Optimization - Just The Basics
  5. PDF Document Properties - Initial View
  6. SEO for PDF Summary
  7. SEO for Office Documents (Extended Article)
  8. Community Comments

PDF Document Properties - Description

The Description Tab is where most of your search optimized content resides.
Document Properties
  1. File: quality-rater-guidelines-2007.pdf File = - If a Title is not present (see next), the file name is used by default. This is why it is imperative that your file names are relevant (suggest hyphens as keyword separator) and that you've crafted an optimized document title.
  2. Title: Guidelines for Quality Raters Title = - This is the single most important element of your PDF Document Properties. This is used as the title in the SERPs. Remember, if this is not populated, the file name e.g. quality-rater-guidelines-2007.pdf is used by default.
  3. Author: Google This can be a company name or an individual's name.
  4. Subject: General Guidelines for Quality Raters: how to evaluate web pages and search results (2007) Subject = Snippet - The Subject serves as the META Description for your PDF Document. It is the second most important element after the Title.
  5. Keywords: google, quality raters, evaluation process, web spam The Keywords dialog is here for a reason, use it effectively. I keep them brief, usually 3-5 primary keywords, no fluff.

PDF Document Properties - Additional Metadata

Once you've populated the Description information, you can build Additional Metadata into your PDF Document. Click on the Additional Metadata button and you are presented with this dialog window.
Additional Metadata
Notice how most of the information you entered in the Description Tab is already populated in this dialog. The Additional Metadata you can enter are;
  1. Author Title
  2. Description Writer
  3. Copyright Status
  4. Copyright Notice
  5. Reference to your Copyright Info URL
If you look at the left menu, you'll notice an Advanced selection at the bottom. If you choose that, you'll see a good overview of how your PDF Document may be interpreted by crawlers. See the 5 examples below.

PDF Document Properties - 5 Examples

Just The Basics

The above covers just the basics of PDF Document Optimization for Search. Once you start to optimize PDFs on a regular basis, you find out how important they can be in the overall equation.
There are a variety of strategies that can be utilized when working with a library of PDF Documents, the above is first and foremost with ALL documents, not just PDFs. This applies to Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and/or any publishing software.
While we're in the Document Properties dialog, we might as well optimize the document for our visitors viewing pleasure.

PDF Document Properties - Initial View

These are the default settings for the Document's Initial View, what the visitor sees when they open the PDF from a link. In many instances, this is really not the best setting as the user ends up with a document that is not optimized for viewing.
Initial View

PDF Document Properties - Initial View - Optimized for Viewing

Most of the time we're working with multi-page PDF Documents. If there are too many pages and the document can be broken down into logical mini-documents, we may suggest that. It's like taking really long web pages and breaking them down into groups of highly targeted pages.
I like using the Pages Panel and Page as Initial View.
Initial View - Navigation Tab

PDF Document Properties - Initial View - Single Page

I assume that most users have a viewport that may not display two-up pages large enough to read on initial open. In fact, I've had to make adjustments myself when opening PDFs that are configured using the two-up options. I suggest the Single Page Initial View.
Initial View - Page Layout

PDF Document Properties - Initial View - Fit Visible

I like fluidness in layout. Using any of the Fit options provide a fluid experience for the viewer. I prefer using the Fit Visible as most users have their browser viewports set to a comfortable width and height that allows them to read most content without changing the size of their viewport.
Initial View - Magnification

PDF Document Properties - Initial View - Window Options

I'll choose the Resize window to initial page and Center window on screen options. Be sure to choose the Show: Document Title option.
Initial View - Show

SEO for PDF Summary

That's it for optimizing PDF Document Properties. This article discusses just one aspect of SEO for PDFs. The actual document itself can also be optimized for search. Use PDFs to your advantage. Think about taking larger multi-page PDFs and breaking them down to their least common denominator then offer them up as a group of PDFs from within an HTML Document that is well formed and semantically structured.
Review the first page of your PDF Document and make sure that it best represents the content of your PDF. In many instances, this may be a Table of Contents which usually isn't the most optimal page to have as the first page, not from a search perspective. That is why using the Document Properties to their full extent is imperative when Optimizing PDFs for Search.



Source : Seo Consultants

Word, PowerPoint, and Excel Documents Optimization for Search Engine

2010-03-25 - In a previous related article about SEO for PDFs, I outlined the procedures for Optimizing PDF for Search, this is a natural extension of that article.

When working with Microsoft Office Documents, the File > Properties will reveal the dialog window required to input your optimized data for search, I've found this applies to most publishing software.

I've provided screenshots from three of the most popular Microsoft Office Document Formats; Microsoft Word (.doc), Microsoft PowerPoint (.ppt), and Microsoft Excel (.xls).

It is best practice for authors to specify the Properties for ALL documents. These Properties may be used by search engine crawlers, document indexing services on protected Intranets, etc., the Properties provides Machine Readable Content for those crawlers.

Also keep in mind that if these Office Document Formats are converted to PDF, the original Document Properties are transferred over to the PDF Document Properties maintaining metadata integrity from the originating source.

Table of Contents

  1. Microsoft Word
  2. Microsoft PowerPoint
  3. Microsoft Excel
  4. SEO for Office Documents Summary
  5. SEO for PDFs - Optimizing PDF for Search
  6. Community Comments

Microsoft Word

I've produced three documents all based off the original PDF, Google Quality Raters Guidelines, used as an example in the SEO for PDFs article. I wanted to show you how consistency is maintained across the Office Documents programs.

In most Microsoft Office programs, the Summary and Contents tabs are where you will focus most of your document optimization efforts. If you have custom data (e.g. Metadata) to add, you can usually do that through the Custom tab.

Word Document Properties - Summary

If I take the above Word .doc and convert it to .pdf, the Document Properties automatically transfer to the PDF Document Properties so you are not duplicating your efforts from one program to the next.

This all assumes that the original Office Document was properly constructed (using semantics) to begin with which is not an easy task for many.

This means you'll need to really focus your efforts in the Document Properties area to take advantage of first to market content that sits above the content of the document itself.

Think of this like the section of your document. You're populating the and META Description along with a few other elements by using the Document Properties.

Word Headings In the Contents tab, you'll find the of the document along with the Word document structure. Notice the label Headings? If the author failed to use proper semantics in the Word document by choosing the Heading 1 thru Heading 6 options (see image at right), then the Contents of this document would not display properly. Nor would the Word .doc be optimized to it's fullest extent by using proper formatting commands during document construction e.g. Headings, Lists, Definitions, etc.

Word Document Properties - Contents

Microsoft PowerPoint

The PowerPoint Document Properties look identical to all the other Microsoft Office Programs. There are some slight differences where the data is pulled from.

PowerPoint Document Properties - Summary

PowerPoint Document Properties - Contents

For instance, with PowerPoint, slide naming conventions (Slide Titles) are an important factor in optimizing the document for search.

Microsoft Excel

If you viewed the screenshots together for Word, PowerPoint, and Excel for Summary of the Document Properties, you'll find they are identical. Kudos to Microsoft for maintaining consistency across all document formats.

Shown LTR: Word, PowerPoint, Excel
Word Document Properties PowerPoint Document Properties Excel Document Properties

Excel Document Properties - Summary

Excel Document Properties - Contents

With Excel, your Worksheet naming conventions are an important factor in optimizing the document for search.

SEO for Office Documents Summary

That's it for optimizing Office Document Properties. This article discusses just one aspect of SEO for Microsoft Office Documents. The actual documents themselves can also be optimized for search by using proper semantic formatting during document construction as noted above.


Source :

SEO Consultants Directory

June 29, 2011

Guide to Sitemap : Types and Resources

Sitemaps are created to for web usability purposes and to notify search engines about a site’s page index. Most people are familiar with HTML and XML sitemaps, however there are multiple types of sitemaps that can provide benefits for your website. Here is a complete guide of sitemap types, sitemap resources, and how each of these sitemaps can benefit your site.
HTML Sitemap
A HTML sitemap is simply a hierarchical list of links on a web page that helps web visitors review in a quick glance a site’s index of pages, which helps promote site usability. A well built HTML sitemap will highlight pages of a site with great importance and diminish 2nd or 3rd tier pages, making it easy to search an entire website from one web page. See an example of a HTML sitemap.
Resource: HTML Sitemaps Guide
googlebot1
Image Credit: eVisibility
XML Sitemap
XML sitemaps are created for search engines to inform them about URLs that are available on a website to be crawled. For large sites or sites that have accessibility issues, can make it difficult for search engines to index all of its pages. By submitting a XML sitemap, it will help search engines find all of those pages that can be nested a few directories deep. See an example of a XML sitemap.
Resource: SEOmoz – XML Sitemaps: Guideline on their Use
ROR Sitemap
A XML variant, ROR sitemaps are used to describe any object on a website. They are much more robust than XML because it supports multiple formats including URLs, products, articles, company bios, events, etc.
To create a ROR sitemap try ROR Sitemap Generator or Cumbrowski’s Free ROR Sitemap Generator.
Video Sitemap
A Video sitemap contains links to a videos landing page, along with information that is essential for indexing the video to make it searchable for sites like Google Video. To submit a video sitemap to Google there are certain fields that are required including the video url, the video and video player location, a video thumbnail, and a video title and description. Google can crawl the following formats; .mpg, .mpeg, .mp4, .mov, .wmv, .asf, .avi, .ra, .ram, .rm, .flv.
Geo Sitemap
Google recognizes Geo Sitemaps that enable you to publish geo-content that can be searchable in Google Maps and Google Earth. Geo-content can be in KML or GeoRSS format. Be sure to add the attribution tag which appears in the Google search results for your content.
News Sitemap
News sitemaps allow webmasters to have more control over their content that gets submitted to Google News. You can also add additional information about your news, like article title, publication date, and keywords. Using a news sitemap is perfect for websites that are new, have dynamic content, or large sites that can be hard to find content. Keep in mind that Google only allows you to submit content from the last three days.
Mobile Sitemap
Mobile sitemaps allow you to submit a list of URLs with content specifically designed for mobile devices and is used in the search engine’s mobile index. Searching the mobile web is different than the regular web, for instance it only displays sites that are “mobile friendly.” Using well-formed markup like WML, cHTML, XHTML Basic or XHTML MP formats will ensure your content gets crawled. See an example of a Mobile Sitemap.

Recommended Sitemap Resources

Google Sitemap Generator
Allows you to create XML, News, Mobile, Geo, HTML, Text, ROR, and Video sitemaps. Unlike 3rd party sitemap generators, the Google Sitemap Generator will monitor your website content and update automatically.
AuditMyPC – XML Sitemap Generator
Create unlimited XML and HTML sitemaps. You must have Sun’s Java Runtime installed in order to create a sitemap.
XML Sitemaps.com
Allows you to create XML, ROR, Text and HTML sitemaps, up to 500 pages (Free Version) or Unlimited pages for the paid version. Paid version cost $19.99.
Google XML Sitemaps for WordPress
This wordpress plug-in is by far the best sitemap generator. Nathan Rice has a great post on the Ultimate Guide to WordPress SEO that goes into great detail of the plugin and the process.
by Mark Thompson

Source : Atlantic BT

Symptoms and Remedies of Google Panda Update 2.2

Google Panda Update 2.2, the latest update by Google to their search engine ranking system has hit the rankings and affected search results of millions of websites across the globe. This update by Google is targeted to downplay content farms and websites which have heavy amounts of duplicate pages.

Mentionable that Google has been releasing a series of updates to their search engine ranking system since February this year. First it was the Google Panda Update, and then the Google Panda 2 and most recently Google Panda update 2.2. Google Panda update 2.2 was deployed a week earlier so silently that it took the web world by complete surprise. For example, popular sites such as eHow and Wikihow, who publish contents previously published elsewhere has been hugely affected.

Certain situations widely seen post implementation of Google Panda Update 2.2

  • Quality of site, not power of keywords anymore

Some websites have complained of visitor drops ranging from 20% to 50% post the implementation of Google Panda update 2.2. This is mainly because Google now trying to give more importance to quality than the strength of the keywords.

In earlier days the mostly the keywords yielded the results and websites could manipulate their content using strong and popular keywords. However with this update by Google, it now depends on the location of the keyword and not just the words. Google will show up better results of the sites with good quality and not from any xyz sites just because they use the strong keywords repeatedly.

  • End of monopoly by Exact Match Domain (EMD) sites

Exact Match Domain Sites of EMDs used to a gold mine for lot of product and marketing companies. For example, if there is a site called weddingring.com and someone searches for keyword wedding ring in Google, the user is bound to get to the site weddingring.com even if the quality of site is pathetic compared to other sites of similar businesses. With the Panda Update, users will be able to reach to better sites instantly and the monopoly of such Exact Match Domain searches will be over.

  • No more rise to fame by Copy-Paste

The Google Panda Update 2.2 has enough resources to knock down spam bloggers who just copies content from other websites and auto-blogs from authentic contents. This is being welcomed by the web world as the phenomenon of powered by Control-C, Driven by Control-V was hitting the original and authentic sites badly. It is being hoped that Google Panda Update 2.2 will help overcome this piracy.

Ways to Crack Google Panda Update 2.2

  • Stop copying articles as-it- is into websites

Google wants to bring an end to the practice of duplicate websites showing up better results and ranks by publishing duplicate articles (published elsewhere originally). Websites are better served if they do not copy or publish the same article as it was published originally. However if the article is published by providing a link to the original website and with a separate introduction about the article, Google considers it as quality indicator of the website and throws up better in search results and rankings.

  • Include unique content with same popular keywords

Google is tired of reading the same thing on different websites and one thing they want out of the Panda Update 2.2 is more original. Hence keeping an active stream of well written content with same keywords into a website will be blessed with favorable rankings.

  • Be regular in posting content

Google is known to show better results with recent content material and quality content. So a website that is more regularly updated with unique content has better chances of appealing more visitors through Google searches.

  • Increase incoming links from Authority Sites

Common and popular authority sites include Facebook.com, Youtube.com, Twitter.com, LinkedIn.com, etc. Google is seen to have respected sites which are directed with hyperlinks from such authority sites. So if someone shares a link of your website in Facebook in his wall, it means Google with value your website.


Source : Times of Assam

Symptoms and Remedies of Google Panda Update 2.2

Google Panda Update 2.2, the latest update by Google to their search engine ranking system has hit the rankings and affected search results of millions of websites across the globe. This update by Google is targeted to downplay content farms and websites which have heavy amounts of duplicate pages.
Mentionable that Google has been releasing a series of updates to their search engine ranking system since February this year. First it was the Google Panda Update, and then the Google Panda 2 and most recently Google Panda update 2.2. Google Panda update 2.2 was deployed a week earlier so silently that it took the web world by complete surprise. For example, popular sites such as eHow and Wikihow, who publish contents previously published elsewhere has been hugely affected.
Certain situations widely seen post implementation of Google Panda Update 2.2
  • Quality of site, not power of keywords anymore
Some websites have complained of visitor drops ranging from 20% to 50% post the implementation of Google Panda update 2.2. This is mainly because Google now trying to give more importance to quality than the strength of the keywords.
In earlier days the mostly the keywords yielded the results and websites could manipulate their content using strong and popular keywords. However with this update by Google, it now depends on the location of the keyword and not just the words. Google will show up better results of the sites with good quality and not from any xyz sites just because they use the strong keywords repeatedly.
  • End of monopoly by Exact Match Domain (EMD) sites
Exact Match Domain Sites of EMDs used to a gold mine for lot of product and marketing companies. For example, if there is a site called weddingring.com and someone searches for keyword wedding ring in Google, the user is bound to get to the site weddingring.com even if the quality of site is pathetic compared to other sites of similar businesses. With the Panda Update, users will be able to reach to better sites instantly and the monopoly of such Exact Match Domain searches will be over.
  • No more rise to fame by Copy-Paste
The Google Panda Update 2.2 has enough resources to knock down spam bloggers who just copies content from other websites and auto-blogs from authentic contents. This is being welcomed by the web world as the phenomenon of powered by Control-C, Driven by Control-V was hitting the original and authentic sites badly. It is being hoped that Google Panda Update 2.2 will help overcome this piracy.

Ways to Crack Google Panda Update 2.2
  • Stop copying articles as-it- is into websites
Google wants to bring an end to the practice of duplicate websites showing up better results and ranks by publishing duplicate articles (published elsewhere originally). Websites are better served if they do not copy or publish the same article as it was published originally. However if the article is published by providing a link to the original website and with a separate introduction about the article, Google considers it as quality indicator of the website and throws up better in search results and rankings.
  • Include unique content with same popular keywords
Google is tired of reading the same thing on different websites and one thing they want out of the Panda Update 2.2 is more original. Hence keeping an active stream of well written content with same keywords into a website will be blessed with favorable rankings.
  • Be regular in posting content
Google is known to show better results with recent content material and quality content. So a website that is more regularly updated with unique content has better chances of appealing more visitors through Google searches.
  • Increase incoming links from Authority Sites
Common and popular authority sites include Facebook.com, Youtube.com, Twitter.com, LinkedIn.com, etc. Google is seen to have respected sites which are directed with hyperlinks from such authority sites. So if someone shares a link of your website in Facebook in his wall, it means Google with value your website.

Source : Times of Assam

June 27, 2011

Local Listing: An Attempt to Understand Rank Factors

Local listing rank has become a very large part of SEO over the past years and is becoming more so as Google improves their algorithm and displays the map 10 pack on more and more searches. With few good resources on the web (http://www.davidmihm.com/local-search-ranking-factors.shtml is great but starting to become out of date), I decided to take an indepth look into local searches for some of my clients as well as that for my business to see if I could put my finger on which facet of the local listing Google values the most in its algorithm.
The factors that I looked at were items that the business owner can control in their listing such as
  • location in the title of the listing (ie: San Diego SEO)
  • product in the title of the listing (ie: San Diego SEO)
  • location in the description of the the listing (ie: Online Advertising San Diego SEO and PPC Bid Management)
  • product in the description of the the listing (ie: Online Advertising San Diego SEO and PPC Bid Management)
  • Photos
  • Videos
And I also looked at factors that are out of the business owner's control which Google associates with your listing such as
  • Reviews
  • User content
  • Web Sites (how google chooses these sites is a discussion continued below)
  • Miles the business is located from the city center
I selected two competitive markets, San Diego Acupuncture & San Diego SEO as well as one of my client's field which is not very competitive, San Diego Resume.
First up, analysis on 'San Diego Acupuncture'
Keywords entered into business listing

First off this is a very competitive market, and you'll note that only one of the top 10 has 'San Diego' location in the title of their listing. There used to be a time when the title was pretty much the only major factor in the ranking of a local listing, but this time as recently passed as Google is improving their listing algorithm. This factor was being exploited and you'd see full sentences of keywords spamming the title of the listing, but obviously we knew this wouldn't last.
Quantifiable Listing Facts

The Google controlled aspects of the listing seem to be all over the board but, lets look at some general averages.
  • avg # web sites for top 3: 9.666
  • avg # web sites for bottom 3: 11.333
  • avg # user content for top 3: 2
  • avg # user content for bottom 3: 1.333
  • avg # reviews for top 3: 5.333
  • avg # reviews for bottom 3: 1.333
  • avg distance for top 3: 2.7
  • avg distance for bottom 3: 2.9
So what's most important? There's a higher number of average reviews for the top 3 than the bottom, but the #1 listing for 'San Diego Acupuncture' has none! Distance from the city center seems pretty consistent and average # of user content items is pretty close, so what kind of information can you derive from this? Well lets keep moving onto the next case study and I'll tie it all in at the end.
Here is the data analysis for 'San Diego SEO', my competition. (my site is #7 in this list)
Keywords entered into business listing

As expected, the user controlled aspects of the top 10 local listings are pretty well optimized across the board so the true differences must be in the Google controlled aspects, correct?
Quantifiable Listing Facts

  • avg # web sites for top 3: 5
  • avg # web sites for bottom 3: 2.6
  • avg user content for top 3: .666
  • avg user content for bottom 3: 0
  • avg # reviews for top 3: 2
  • avg # reviews for bottom 3: 1
  • avg distance for top 3: 1.633
  • avg distance for bottom 3 7.1
One thing sticks out here, but its an anomally. The #1 ranked listing doesn't have the most reviews, user content, or web pages associated with the account. To complete the confusion, the business owner has provided no pictures & video and some of his reviews are negative. In general the listings with the most sites associated with them find their way to the top, but thats not always the case. Let's look at one last case study and I'll bring it all home.
Here is the data for 'San Diego Resume', a low competition market in this region.
Keywords entered into business listing

As you can see, these listings are not very well optimized by the business owners and in fact (not shown above), some of them aren't even resume services but are staffing agencies.
Quantifiable Listing Facts

  • avg # web sites for top 3: 6
  • avg # web sites for bottom 3: 1
  • avg user content for top 3: 1
  • avg user content for bottom 3: 0
  • avg # reviews for top 3: 1
  • avg # reviews for bottom 3:0
  • avg distance for top 3: 5.6
  • avg distance for bottom 3: 3.1
Ok, this most recent data at least provides me with some useful information on how google works in uncompetitive markets. You'll notice lumps of green for user content and web pages near the top of rankings. You'll also notice that location to city center isn't that large of an indicator for higher rank.
Discussion and Conclusion
So if you've made it this far, here's where you're hoping that I provide some brilliant insight of how to improve you and your clients' local listings. Well, the bad news is there is no clear winner for the most important category of a local listing, but I have learned quite abit about how local listings work and how Google's algorithm is changing and I will provide you with a list of tips that will help you improve your listings. There are other potential factors which are hard to quantify such as age of listing which I simply can't comment on and I have read things about Google placing higher rank on reviews that are created with Google Users who have detailed user profiles but in my practice have not noticed this to make a lick of difference.
Tips to improve your listings
  • Provide as much info to Google when you claim and fill out your local listing.
  • Title is most important of the user controlled facets of the listing and must have your keywords in it, though its overall weight is declining. That said be care of spamming, Google will eventually streamline this further and you don't want to be on the outside looking in.
  • No need to put your city in the title, Google is smart enough to know where your business is located with your provided address.
  • keywords and location in your description will help but not much.
And here's the most important thing you can do to improve your business listing.
  • Submit your website info to as many local directories as possible (ie, yelp.com, kudzu.com, yellowpages.com, etc)
The more sophisticated Google's local algorithm becomes the more value they place on content generated by the community and the less they value what the business owner tells them. The reason is simple: relying on business owners' info allows spam to creep into the results and its hard to spam across mutiple 3rd party sources of information. From these 3rd party sources, Google can derive reviews, images, videos, user content, webpages and more to help complete your local listing in their system. As in organic SEO, more is not always better. Some sites like bbb.org are valued higher by Google and being listed in their directories will go a long way to improve your rank.
For uncompetitive markets, you may be able to get away with keywords in titles, descriptions, and a few made up reviews but that will simply not be enough when competiting against sites that can have a great presnce across the web in places like yelp.
Of course, this makes optimizing your listing a time consuming process and one that is generally out of your control. Google takes a long time to associate external content to your listing (I've been waiting for months) and has been known to associate incorrect information to your business listing occasionally. Also I had 3 'web sites' recently disassociated with my business listing, though they were all valid and they have yet to return.
Always remember that Google's listing algorithm is rapidly changing and what works one day may be worthless the next. If you have a listing that you know you've gotten to rank well due to spam I highly recommend taking a hard look in the mirror and making the decision to come clean because you will get busted and it won't be pretty when it happens.
I hope this helps you guys as you try to help your clients as well as your own listing. If you read this far I'm impressed.

Posted by
Sourece : YOUmoz | SEOmoz

The 7 Deadly Sins of Google Local Listings

It really doesn’t matter if you consider yourself a sinner or a saint for you to benefit from some lessons I have had to learn the hard way. You see, in my daily work I live in this universe where Google is the “Supreme Being”. There are Google commandments and I have to make the choice to either do some shortcut-marketing, or play by their rules.
In my “teenage internet marketing years” when I was first playing around with local listings, I experimented with many things that might not exactly be 100% down the whitehat trail of happiness. Now, I am much older, much wiser, much worse looking, and I have been able to determine a few practices that might be tempting for some, but to me they are 7 deadly sins that will ultimately lead down a path of destruction for your local listing.

1. Stuffing Your Business Title With Keywords

This is by far the most common type of sin found on Google Places listings. A company with the business name of “company x” will claim their listing and then put the business name as “company x + location and category”.
Picture 2.png
I understand that for the short term, locations and keywords can actually help rankings. For some reason the “Supreme Being” of local listings feels that keywords in your business name should have an effect on overall map rankings and coming from a company named Google instead of Search Engine I do find that ironic. Still, they state in their Places Pages Guidelines,.. “Do not attempt to manipulate search results by adding extraneous keywords or a description of your business into the business name.” So, you are left with a conflicting option. Some would say “Hey, if it helps, then I will stuff that title like a turkey on Thanksgiving.” But here is a look at how Google is moving to penalize listings that do this…
Picture 3.png
If you were to visit a non-claimed places page and click on the edit this listing link, you would be taken to a page where you can make a few changes to the listing. On the right hand side you would see the box pictured above. As Professor Maps pointed out recently if you click on the edit history link then you can see the changes made by users, and most importantly what Google “thinks” about these changes.
On looking through a few I found a very interesting note that can be flagged on a listing. In dealing with business names you will see the phrase “Name is longer than average”. So, if a group of businesses stuff keywords, then most likely they will be tagged with the same comment, and it would become a very easy task to penalize companies with long titles that are location and category focused.

2. Putting Location Keywords in your Categories

On a places page, you are given 5 categories for your local business. To maximize the targeting of these categories, people would put the city location that they were targeting. For instance, if you were a plumber in Chicago, your category would be “Chicago Plumber” instead of just “plumber”.
Picture 4.png
This used to be the jewel of how to get higher rankings, authoritative one boxes, market dominance, and sneaky satisfaction of knowing that you outwitted the competition. But, one sad day as I was checking rankings of a few listings I noticed a substantial drop. Upon investigation I found that locations in categories was the culprit. Upon removing location keywords my rankings were back to normal within a day.
This was something discussed by Carter Maslan from Google in a very informative discussion on categories a few moons ago.

3. Using a P.O. Box For Your Business Address

Many companies might not want to use their physical location in Google maps for a number of various reasons. They might run from a house, or their operations might not be in the area that they actually serve. So, for years companies have used P.O. Boxes for a local presence. The problem with using a box is that Google ranks businesses based on an ability to prove your geo-location and area of service. A P.O. Box is not a geo-location. It is not something that appears as a pin-point on a map. It is at a post office which might or might not be recognizable by the mapping system.
The Google guidelines are quite clear on the issue…”Do not create listings at locations where the business does not physically exist. PO Boxes do not count as physical locations.“

4. Using a call tracking number

This is quite possibly the most annoying issue in local search currently. As pointed out through the rest of this post, Google is very strict in regards to a company’s business name, address, and also the phone number. These are the 3 things that the local bots search the web for to gather business data. So, if you have discrepancies around the web regarding your name, address and phone number, then you end up shooting yourself in the foot for rankings. This is why call tracking numbers don’t work. It is a separate number which will confuse the system and will lead to listing issues. Call tracking is an area that I see needs improvements in local search in order to improve the ability to track conversions, and even though many local search companies offer call tracking options…they should not be used on a Google local listing.

5. Faking Reviews

Reviews help rankings. This is an undisputable thought amongst the local search crowd. And if anything affects rankings, then people will game it. So, how can Google crack down on reviews?
  1. Account age and history- not only does Google flag listings with long titles, but they also mark individual Google accounts with phrases like… “User has entered risky data in the past.” Or “User has made few edits”.
  2. User Report- The people that are most likely to read your reviews are yourself, and your competition. If your competition even has the smallest idea that you have put fake reviews in your name, staff member names, or fake names, then they will turn you in like a winning lotto ticket. This can be done right on your places page under “Flag as inappropriate”.
  3. Star Ratings- Google can also see that if one listing has all 5 star reviews and the accounts that are leaving reviews don’t have any history, then it is most like fake reviews. If you receive a large sum of reviews in short period of time, that might flag your listing as well.
The key with reviews is to make them real, Google has not yet came down on review spamming with full force, but when they come…sinners beware.

6. Hiding Your Address

Recently, places pages came out with the ability to show service locations, and also hide your address for home based businesses or businesses where customers don’t come to your shop. I do think this will be a good feature in the future, but at launch time I ran some tests that resulted in an immediate drop in local rankings.
Picture-28.png

It has been reported by some that they didn’t see any significant drops. I tested it on 3 different type of businesses in different areas and saw drops in every listing. So, be careful and try it both ways. The drop was immediate and upon disabling the “Do not show my address” option my listings returned instantly.

7. Stuffing your description with duplicate information

This is the newest area of concern to add to the list. I used to write business descriptions with very focused keywords that I was trying to rank for with some good results. I always included categories, and location information as it described the business quite well. The last update to the Google Places Guidelines has this to say…
“Use the description and custom attribute fields to include additional information about your listing. This type of content should never appear in your business’s title, address or category fields.“
I have not seen dramatic drop in rankings from this, but Google is fairly good about keeping to their guidelines and penalizing things that they find that are not in line. So, this is an area to watch and play it safe. It should be used to explain your long tail keyword information that could be of benefit, or explain a wider area of service then your categories.

Conclusion

People look at sin in different ways. Some say there is no such thing and we should party like it’s 1999, some live their life trying not to break the commands of their belief system. Well, in this case…Google is God whether you want them to be or not, and short term sinning against them might bring joy and good rankings, but long term it will only bring banishment and having to re list with annoying phone verifications.
My advice is to play it safe. You can still outrank anyone who doesn’t (with a good understanding of local search ranking factors) and most importantly, the ranking lasts for the long term. Ultimately, the choice is yours in how you deal with the 7 deadly’s.

Written By:Mike Ramsey

Source : Search Engine Journal

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More